• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About KK
  • Resources
    • Income Tax Calculator
  • Freebies
  • Blog
  • Ask KK

Risk N Returns

Personal Finance and Investment Ideas

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Start Here
  • Current Portfolio
  • Personal Finance
  • Invest

Dual class shares and their implications

July 5, 2018 By KK


Me You

SGX recently announced that they will be allowing companies with dual class share structures to list on the SGX with immediate effect. This prompted a friend to ask me what this meant, so I thought I’ll write an article about it this week.


What are dual class shares?

Singaporean investors should be familiar with the traditional company share structure – the concept where owning 1 share entitles you to 1 vote. This essentially means there’s only 1 class of shares. On the other hand, dual class shares means there are 2 or more classes of shares in the company, with the main difference being in the voting entitlement per share.

The concept of dual class shares is not new, it has been a structure that has been allowed in the US for the longest time. Traditionally, it had been the share structure of choice for family owned businesses who seek to float their shares on the stock market. Examples of this include the New York Times and the Ford Motor Company. In more recent times, this structure was popularised by Silicon Valley unicorns like Google (now Alphabet) and Facebook who have strong founder-led cultures.

To illustrate the concept of dual class share structures, let’s take a look at Alphabet’s share structure.

Alphabet Example
Equity share is computed assuming each share was issued at $1 per share

Class A and C are publicly traded, while Class B is held in the hands of Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin. As you can see, despite only putting up 7% of the company’s equity, the founders have 61% control of the company. Even if you exclude Class C shares from equity calculations (since Class C shares were issued free in a 1 for 1 stock dividend exercise back in 2014), they have only put up 14% of the company’s equity.


Implications

1) Inequality amongst shareholders

As you can see from the Alphabet illustration, dual class share structures are unfair to the “lesser shareholders”. Despite putting up most of the equity, they do not receive the proportionate amount of voting power at AGMs.

2) Founders can sit pretty on their throne

This can be a boon or a bane. If you have founders with foresight and morality, giving them absolute control of the company through such shares can eliminate a worry of theirs and allow them to focus on running the business. On the flip side, if you have founders who are terrible or are just out to cheat investors’ funds, “lesser shareholders” are not able to vote them out of the company due to a lack of voting power. Of course, you can vote for or against by buying or selling the company’s shares, but you would probably incur losses doing so.

3) Price differential between the different share classes

The difference in number of votes per share creates price differences between each class of shares. Naturally, share classes with more votes should trade at a premium compared to their less counterparts. This is evident once again in Alphabet’s example:

This price differential is something to be aware of and can potentially create minor arbitrage opportunities.


If its so bad, why is SGX allowing it?

One word – Competition. SGX’s main competitor, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange allowed dual class shares structures in April this year. If they were to remain firm and continue to disallow it, prospective tech companies might simply choose to list in Hong Kong instead. Interestingly, Xiaomi announced their intention to list in Hong Kong soon after the rule relaxation.

The pain of missing out on the Manchester United IPO in 2012 and the continued lack of Tech IPOs in Singapore is also another push factor.

What does this mean for investors?

For now, nothing. There are currently no companies listed in Singapore under the dual class structure. You should only to be aware of this when such companies start listing or if you wish to buy the Tech stocks in the US or for now Xiaomi in Hong Kong. Just know that investing in companies with dual class share structures are like putting your money with a fund manager. You are effectively surrendering control of your funds to the founders, with the only decision you can make is whether to stay invested or not.

Happy Hunting,
KK

If you love the articles I write, like my Facebook Page or follow my blog and never miss another article!


Related

Filed Under: Invest Tagged With: Dual Class Shares


Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 338 other subscribers

Search my site

Top Posts & Pages

  • My Guide to the CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS)
    My Guide to the CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS)
  • Singapore Savings Bonds (SSBs) - August 2019 Issue
    Singapore Savings Bonds (SSBs) - August 2019 Issue

Archives

  • January 2022 (1)
  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (1)
  • July 2021 (1)
  • June 2021 (1)
  • May 2021 (1)
  • March 2021 (1)
  • February 2021 (2)
  • January 2021 (2)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • November 2020 (1)
  • October 2020 (1)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (3)
  • July 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • May 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (2)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (7)
  • January 2020 (4)
  • December 2019 (4)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (2)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • August 2019 (7)
  • July 2019 (7)
  • June 2019 (8)
  • May 2019 (7)
  • April 2019 (8)
  • March 2019 (12)
  • February 2019 (8)
  • January 2019 (4)
  • December 2018 (4)
  • October 2018 (4)
  • September 2018 (6)
  • August 2018 (6)
  • July 2018 (3)
  • June 2018 (6)
  • May 2018 (4)
  • April 2018 (6)
  • March 2018 (9)
  • February 2018 (6)
  • January 2018 (10)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (2)
  • October 2017 (1)
  • September 2017 (3)




Copyright © 2023 | Risk N Returns