• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About KK
  • Resources
    • Income Tax Calculator
  • Freebies
  • Blog
  • Ask KK

Risk N Returns

Personal Finance and Investment Ideas

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Start Here
  • Current Portfolio
  • Personal Finance
  • Invest

Capitaland Retail China Trust (CRCT) to buy 3 malls from Capitaland- Is it a Good Deal?

June 15, 2019 By KK

Capitaland Retail China Trust announced a planned acquisition of 3 malls from their sponsor Capitaland recently. As a unitholder, I obviously have a vested interest to know more. Here are the key highlights, with some financing structure speculation at the end.

Property Highlights

0
Properties
0 m
Property Value
0 %
Occupancy
0 %
NPI Yield
0
GFA (sqm)
0 %
Increase in GFA

Summary

Source: CRCT Announcement Slides

The 3 properties consist of CapitaMall Xuefu and CapitaMall Aidemengdun in Harbin, and CapitaMall Yuhuating in Changsha. Changsha and Harbin are the respective provincial capitals of Hunan and Heilongjiang. This continues the REITs recent trend of acquisitions and diversification away from Tier 1 cities into more Tier 2 cities.

Bulking up

Source: CRCT Announcement Slides

AUM for CRCT will increase by 19% to S$3.8 billion. This desire to bulk up is in line with recent S-REIT M&A trends to make themselves more attractive to institutional investors and allow them to add more weapons to their arsenal to grow.

Purchase Valuation and NPI Accretion

Source: CRCT Announcement Slides

2 valuers were engaged as part of this transaction – Cushman & Wakefield and JLL. The agreed purchase price was at a discount of 1.2% and 0.2% to the respective valuations.

Acquisition Cost and Financing details

Total acquisition cost is expected to be $505.4m comprising of:

  1. Purchase consideration & shareholder loan – $489m
  2. Acquisition fee to managers – $5.9m
  3. Professional and other fees – $10.5m
The announcement lacked any detail on the potential funding mix, only saying that it will be determined at a later time and will involve both debt and equity financing.

Financing debate

It is due to the lack of financing details that led to the quick sell-off in the unit price of the REIT.

Source: Yahoo Finance

I’ve read conflicting analyst research reports on whether a DPU accretive deal can be structured. OCBC broke ranks and even downgraded the REIT to SELL from HOLD off of this news. This is probably partly why the REIT sold off this week.

Separately, CEO Tan Sze Wooi in an article with The Edge Singapore (premium article) gave some insight to management’s thinking:

On DPU Accretion - "Based on the funding plan we are going to settle on, there will be accretion to unitholders, and at the NPI level, and we are confident of putting in place a financing plan to deliver accretion"

On growth targets - "We will grow [around] 20% with this deal size, and for the next cycle of acquisition, we would be looking at close to a further 20% growth, and we hope to achieve $5 billion in assets soon. This is so that we can compete better in cost of capital. We are always working hard to see how we can strengthen the REIT and rejuvenate the portfolio"

On urbanisation and CRCT's strategy - "We want our malls to be a solid magnet for the catchment populations within a radius of three to five km. And even though lifestyles evolve over time, we want our offerings to grow in tandem with our customers’ tastes. Urbanisation will continue; that is why you have new catchment areas and people will want to go somewhere to socialise. That is why we have to keep injecting freshness, and our trade mix requires constant tweaking. For instance, we’ve lowered our exposure to department stores and fashion, and we’ve injected F&B outlets, and are focusing on beauty and healthcare services and education. All the malls are in catchment areas near transport nodes served by public services and are near amenities. So, they [get] habitual repeat customers, and this is the kind of stickiness from customers we are building"

Tan Tze Wooi, CEO - CRCT

In one paragraph, the article even describes pro-forma impacts of the acquisition. Given the way it was written, I wasn’t sure if this was the view of The Edge or the CEO’s view but here it is:

Tan says he is comfortable with a gearing of 38% compared with CRCT’s gearing of 35.5% as at March 31. That provides CRCT with a debt headroom of around $339 million and the remaining amount of about $249 million needs to be raised via an equity issue. With units outstanding of 998.52 million as at March 31, CRCT’s equity raising would be within 20% of its market capitalisation (based on its general mandate), which could be achieved through a placement and preferential equity offering, providing an accretion of up to 1.7% to DPU. Based on FY2018’s DPU of 10.22 cents, pro forma DPU, including the acquisition, could rise to as high as 10.4 cents.

The Edge Singapore

My independent calculation

Given all the conflicting views, who is right? 

I decided that the only way to know is to do the rough work myself and form my own opinion.

Disclaimer: I approached this exercise logically based on my accounting and REIT knowledge. As to why my calculations gave slightly different results from the professional analysts, I have no idea. Do let me know where I messed up (if any) so that I can learn as well.

Funding mix

Figures obtained from financial results as at 31 Mar 2019

I worked backwards by making adjustments to total assets by adding target property value and removing distributions that have yet to be paid. I apply a 38% target gearing mentioned by the CEO and compared it to current borrowings to obtain the debt headroom. I obtain the corresponding equity to be raised by subtracting debt headroom from the cash consideration associated with the acquisition.

Based on this computation, I arrive at a funding mix of $324m of debt and $275m of equity to be raised. Pretty close to what is in the article by The Edge.

Pro-forma NAV impact

Using the expected equity fund raise of $275m and taking into account acquisition fee of $5.9m that will be paid in units, I plotted a graph of Pro-forma NAV vs Equity Issue Price from $1.20 to $1.60.

At issue price of $1.51, yesterday’s closing price, pro-forma NAV is expected to be about $1.58. This represents a slight dilution in NAV from $1.59.

Of course, rights / private placements will be issued at a discount to current share price to attract interest. Pro-forma NAVs range from $1.52 – $1.58 depending on the issue price from $1.20 to $1.50. 

On this evidence, NAV dilution is not expected to be great for this acquisition.

 

Pro-forma DPU impact

Computing pro-forma DPU can be very complicated and with limited information, I could only guess. As such, I did a very rudimentary computation of distributable income by making adjustments to FY2018’s figure.

 

Key assumptions:

  • Debt financed at 2.96%, CRCT’s current cost of debt
  • Base Management Fee
Using this adjusted distributable income, I plot Pro-forma DPU vs Equity Issue Price.

Given that DPU for FY2018 was 10.22c, the acquisition is expected to be yield accretive as long as the equity issue price is higher than $1.32.

My guess

Based on my earlier calculations, the acquisition is likely to be DPU accretive and NAV neutral to slightly dilutive. Given where CRCT is trading now and what my calculations show earlier, it’s safe to say that the fund raising mix is likely to be a private placement cum preferential offering as indicated in The Edge’s article, with the preferential offering price likely to be within the $1.40s range.

Given this expected structure, I think it is overall a positive deal for the REIT.

Caveats

There are 2 factors that might push the REIT to raise more equity than anticipated, which will push the yield accretion of the deal downwards.

  • The CEO has expressed a desire to hit $5b of assets under management. Post acquisition, the REIT will be at $3.8b of AUM. With the REIT hitting 38% gearing in my proposed deal structure, it leaves little room for further acquisitions. As such, the REIT may raise more equity to push gearing back down for future acquisitions.
  • The swap deal where CRCT swaps CapitaMall Saihan for a mall in Hohhot is slatted to close only in 2H 2020. As part of that deal, CRCT has to cough up another about RMB$350m of cash to complete that transaction. As such, the REIT may raise more equity as well in preparation for that transaction.
Only time will tell if I’m right in this.
 
Do you agree with my assessment? Let me know in the comments.
 

Other REIT related articles
REIT Spotlight: Ascendas REIT 2019
REIT Spotlight: AIMS APAC REIT

If you missed my last article
My complete guide to the CPFIS

 
Happy Hunting,
KK
 
If you love the articles I write, follow me on Facebook, Twitter, InvestingNote, StocksCafe or subscribe to my blog and never miss another article!

Related

Filed Under: Companies I've covered, Invest, REITs Tagged With: Capitaland Retail China Trust


Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 338 other subscribers

Search my site

Top Posts & Pages

  • Investment Quadrant 3.0 by The Fifth Person - Course Review
    Investment Quadrant 3.0 by The Fifth Person - Course Review
  • My Guide to the CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS)
    My Guide to the CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS)
  • Singapore Savings Bonds (SSBs) - July 2019 Issue
    Singapore Savings Bonds (SSBs) - July 2019 Issue
  • Singapore Savings Bonds (SSBs) - August 2019 Issue
    Singapore Savings Bonds (SSBs) - August 2019 Issue

Archives

  • January 2022 (1)
  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • September 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (1)
  • July 2021 (1)
  • June 2021 (1)
  • May 2021 (1)
  • March 2021 (1)
  • February 2021 (2)
  • January 2021 (2)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • November 2020 (1)
  • October 2020 (1)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (3)
  • July 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • May 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (2)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • February 2020 (7)
  • January 2020 (4)
  • December 2019 (4)
  • November 2019 (4)
  • October 2019 (2)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • August 2019 (7)
  • July 2019 (7)
  • June 2019 (8)
  • May 2019 (7)
  • April 2019 (8)
  • March 2019 (12)
  • February 2019 (8)
  • January 2019 (4)
  • December 2018 (4)
  • October 2018 (4)
  • September 2018 (6)
  • August 2018 (6)
  • July 2018 (3)
  • June 2018 (6)
  • May 2018 (4)
  • April 2018 (6)
  • March 2018 (9)
  • February 2018 (6)
  • January 2018 (10)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (2)
  • October 2017 (1)
  • September 2017 (3)




Copyright © 2023 | Risk N Returns